Day 1 of the Ostrander Point ERT appeal — an excellent beginning

More than 150 concerned citizens of PEC packed the Sophiasburgh Town Hall in Demorestville on Monday to observe the first day of the Ostrander Point ERT appeal.  Judging from the spontaneous applause after Eric Gillespie’s opening statement, almost everyone was an APPEC and/or PECFN supporter.

The two ERT panel members are Vice-Chair Robert V. Wright, who presided over the preliminary hearing, and Vice-Chair Heather Gibbs.  We are encouraged by the fact that the ERT has assigned two senior and experienced members to hear the appeals.

The first day (a shortened session) was dedicated in part to organizational and procedural matters.  It was reconfirmed that the appeals will be heard sequentially — PECFN first, then APPEC.

Eric Gillespie, the Appellants’ lawyer, gave his opening statement in respect of PECFN’s natural environment appeal.  He suggested that this appeal, which will be first to present multiple witnesses on environmental grounds will be precedent-setting.  Some key assertions:

  • Ostrander Point is likely the worst location in Ontario for wind turbines.
  • If the appeal is denied, no location in Ontario will be safe for birds and bats.
  • This result was surely not the intent of the legislation.

Eric outlined the main points that will be made by PECFN and its expert witnesses:

  • This is the first time that multiple experts will give evidence about the environmental / ecological sensitivity of an Important Bird Area.
  • PEC’s South Shore is one of the few undeveloped tracts of shoreline on Lake Ontario.
  • Ostrander Point includes rare alvar habitat that should be protected.
  • It is home to at least 19 endangered species at risk, both terrestrial and airborne.
  • Fourteen other species also use Ostrander Point as their breeding ground.
  • PEC is a community that cares very deeply about the threat to these resources.
  • More than 1000 comments were submitted to the EBR website  – an unprecedented number for any project to date.
  • Gord Miller, Environmental Commissioner of Ontario, stated in his annual report that wind turbines should not be allowed in IBAs.
  • Several major naturalist groups have also urged that wind turbines be kept out of IBAs.

Eric also provided a brief introduction to the PECFN’s eight expert witnesses (recruited worldwide), listing the impressive credentials and subject area of each person.  The lawyer for the MOE made reference to their witnesses, all from MNR.  Lastly, the lawyer for Gilead briefly listed their witnesses — some from Stantec Consulting, and several independent experts.

Finally, Parker Gallant of Wind Concerns Ontario, accepted as a Participant in the appeals, made his opening statement, indicating that WCO would address bats and biodiversity.

Plans for the rest of the week are:

  • Tuesday, March 5 afternoon — site visit (not open to the public).
  • Wednesday, March 6, all day from 09:30 in Demorestville.
  • Thursday, March 7, starting at 10:00 in Toronto (videoconference testimony)
  • Friday, March 8, all day in Demorestville, starting time to be confirmed.

Because Gilead has stated that it plans to proceed with activity on the Ostrander Point site in April, PECFN has filed a motion for a stay to prevent any work being done prior to the ERT’s decision.  The motion will be heard on Monday, March 18, location and time to be confirmed.

Other planned dates for the PECFN phase of the appeal are: March 25 to 28 and April 3 to 5.

We urge PEC residents to attend as many days of the appeal as possible, to show your concern about this important issue.

HELP!  Both APPEC and PECFN need many thousands of dollars of additional donations to fund their ERT appeals through to completion.  To donate to APPEC, go to  www.appec.wordpress.com or click on the Donate button on the right side of this page.  To donate to PECFN, go to www.saveostranderpoint.org .

Advertisements

Posted on March 5, 2013, in Advocacy / politics / legal, Natural environment, Ostrander Point, Uncategorized, Wind turbines. Bookmark the permalink. 1 Comment.

  1. I certainly hope that the anti-wind farm lobbyists win as these are industrial and n ot a type of windmill. Birds and batas will experience the worst possible deaths as bats’ lungs explode while most birds are hacked by the blades. Not only that any sea life within 10km will also be affected and only the wind turbine supporters will deny such things as minke whales have beached themselves and no one knows what is happening to other forms of sea life. These turbines require backup from some other form of energy because the wind does not blow 24/7 nor too hard so that they have to be turned off. Also you need to look at Scotland and the amount of money that has been paid in subsidies because of the weather unsuitable for wind turbines. Repairs often occur when the turbines run out of warranty and costs have to be born by the community. See National Wind Watch and a US State community that has to pay for a new generator. Also Infigen Energy is now involved in a case with Vestas over failure of turbines.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: